A source-linked view of 487 research records gathered from arXiv cs.CY. This page tracks what entered the ethics.ai source fleet; it is not a complete archive of the publisher and does not imply its endorsement.
last source check succeeded. The source is configured on a daily cadence and was last checked 51m ago.
Topic labels are automatic and can be imperfect. Counts measure records captured by ethics.ai, not everything the publisher produced, readership, importance or agreement with a claim.
arXiv:2608.12320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This article reviews and updates the framework for accountability in AI based on account- ability ecosystems. We update the framework in light of the latest developments since the release of Large Language Models for general public use. We propose three interlinked updates to the original AI accountability ecosystem: (i) reorienting the accountability ecosystem to AI infrastructure and supply chains, (ii) providing greater emphasis on outcomes moni
arXiv:2608.12350v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The energy demand growth and environmental impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) have generated substantial interest in supplying sufficient low-cost electricity for AI-driven data center development. Research on the ability of demand-side management to address these challenges has been more limited. Shifting the amount or timing of demand from retail, corporate, and other organizational behaviors is a plausible option but only if changes in dema
arXiv:2608.12351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has challenged the validity of unsupervised online assessment, especially in technical subjects where plausible answers can be produced with little effort. This paper reports lessons from designing and implementing an AI-aware, AI-testing assessment in a large second-year undergraduate database systems module. The design combined two linked elements: (1) a structured three-part response format (X1-X2-X3) i
arXiv:2608.12352v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI governance frameworks can be known, used, and implemented in form without becoming governance in practice. This paper examines that problem through a role-based stress test of the NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) in consumer lending. We treat framework adoption as a governance translation problem: whether RMF language can become role-usable, cross-level, authority-connected governance over the AI system-in-use, rat
arXiv:2608.12356v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A college offering several overlapping computing degrees implicitly assumes that its programs are differentiated in line with how the labor market segments computing work and that, together, they prepare graduates for that market. Testing this is difficult, because the instruments available to curriculum committees, namely advisory boards, tracer studies, and employer surveys, are slow, narrow, and hard to reproduce. We apply one uniform, taxonomy-
arXiv:2608.12359v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Nutritional labels are legally permitted to appear in very small print, reducing real-world readability and encouraging consumers to rely on 'AI nutrition lens' and vision-capable conversational agents for dietary guidance. We evaluate whether such AI-mediated advice can meaningfully substitute for regulated labeling using a bounded, verifiable task: inferring which of two packaged foods contains less sugar from front-of-pack images alone. A Two-Al
arXiv:2608.12360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background: AI/ML-enabled medical devices are increasingly deployed in healthcare under evolving regulatory frameworks. As these systems become more integrated into clinical decision-making, there is growing expectation that they demonstrate key dimensions of trustworthy AI to support clinician, patient, and public trust. Whether publicly available regulatory documentation provides sufficient evidence to independently assess the trustworthiness of
arXiv:2608.12362v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enabling students to develop systematic problem-solving strategies is a central goal in computing education and of particular relevance in the emerging field of machine learning (ML) education. While exploratory approaches are common in ML learning tasks, fostering the development and persistence of structured problem-solving strategies remains challenging, as these demand considerable metacognitive regulation and persistence, causing learners to o
arXiv:2608.12669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The fair AI/ML literature has long distinguished distributive fairness, concerning how automated systems allocate resources and opportunities, from representational fairness, concerning how they shape the ways individuals and social groups are perceived, understood, and accorded social status. Generative AI is rebalancing these normative dimensions. Unlike predictive systems, large language models (LLMs) and related technologies are fundamentally e
arXiv:2608.12768v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating multi-attribute synthetic populations with realistic joint distributions and geographic variation is a foundational requirement for geo-simulation techniques, such as micro-simulation and agent-based modeling. However, it remains challenging for existing methods to reconstruct region-specific joint distributions from aggregated-level data alone. Thus, we propose a hierarchical diffusion-based generative framework that utilizes a realisti
arXiv:2608.12924v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite the recent intensive development of secondary education curricula and assessments in informatics, the impact of assessments has not been well studied in this field. Since informatics education covers a diverse range of content, from computer science knowledge to ICT skills, careful consideration is needed to prevent assessments from distorting education. This study investigates the impact of introducing ``Informatics I'' into the Common Tes
arXiv:2608.13022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithmic fairness evaluation commonly assesses AI systems as bounded technical components, abstracting away the organizational context in which they operate. We present, to our knowledge, the first independent end-to-end fairness audit of a semi-automated hiring system operated by Barcelona Activa, a public employment agency using the third-party TalentClue platform for candidate search and shortlisting. We analyze approximately 497,000 candidat
arXiv:2608.13351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This study investigates the use of a Learning Management System (LMS) to support self-paced learning at a South African Public Access Centre (PAC), using the I-CAN Centre as a case study. Through semi-structured interviews with thirty-eight learners and thematic analysis, the research explores opportunities and challenges associated with LMS adoption. Findings reveal that PACs play a critical role in promoting ICT skills and digital inclusion, offe
arXiv:2608.13444v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning ethics researchers and critical HCI scholars have argued that algorithmically predicting gender is wrong. At the same time, other researchers rely on predicted gender labels to study gender disparities and develop algorithmic fairness techniques. How do we reconcile these two seemingly contradictory intuitions? We differentiate two ways gender prediction may be wrong: being illegitimate, thereby contributing to harm; and being inva
arXiv:2608.12323v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Specifying a penalty can paradoxically convert a legal obligation into a cost-benefit calculation that favors violation. We demonstrate that this enforcement information paradox systematically occurs in AI agents. While most AI safety evaluations test whether models fail, we investigate why, applying compliance theory from law and economics as a diagnostic tool. We treat compliance theories not as metaphors but as empirical hypotheses and show th
arXiv:2608.12346v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This position paper argues that modern AI alignment methods - originally designed to prevent harmful output - are dual-use technologies that may easily be misused by malicious actors for censorship and manipulation. By mapping current alignment techniques to the possibility and actual cases of misuse, we show that the quest for a "perfectly aligned" model inadvertently also provides malicious actors with an ever-improving tool for informational d
arXiv:2608.12353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Infrastructure scholarship in CSCW often treats breakdown as the moment when infrastructures become visible. However, in vendor-managed sociotechnical systems, not all breakdowns become visible to actors who have the capacity to repair them. Drawing on a retrospective qualitative study of a Chinese K-12 EdTech deployment, including 11 interviews, 5 classroom observations, and more than 28 days of field notes, this paper introduces visibility asym
arXiv:2608.12361v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neologisms, emerging terms in meaning or form, can serve as new vehicles for toxic expression, like "country girl" as a stigmatizing label targeting feminism. Such toxic neologisms appear benign but have evolved into toxic usage in public consensus, posing challenges to moderation systems and remaining underexplored. In this paper, we investigate how to detect implicit toxicity expressed via neologisms. We first propose a taxonomy that captures t
arXiv:2608.12363v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: European countries are debating policies to mitigate the increased energy costs caused by renewed geopolitical tensions, while pursuing decarbonization and electrification. A notable example is Italy's 2026 Decreto Bollette package, which proposes to remove the carbon price equivalent from the bids of certain gas-driven power plants to wholesale electricity markets, among other provisions. We use this as a case study to assess the long-term impli
arXiv:2608.12372v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems are increasingly employed as decision aids, decision delegates, or autonomous decision-makers. This position paper argues that in many settings, particularly high-stakes decision-making, we need accurate cognitively-aligned AI systems that reason similarly to their users, and faithfully communicate their reasoning. We review evidence that cognitive alignment improves understandability and trustworthiness, and provide new survey data sh
ethics.ai stores source metadata, short summaries and links to the original publisher. It does not republish full articles. Use the permanent evidence link for citation, retain the original source link, and verify consequential claims with the publisher. See the methodology and corrections policy and reuse terms.
We'd like to use Google Analytics to see which pages get read — no ads, no selling data. See the privacy policy.