New Terms, New Toxicity: Consensus-based Chinese Neologism Toxicity Detection via Search-Augmented LLMs
arXiv:2608.12361v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neologisms, emerging terms in meaning or form, can serve as new vehicles for toxic expression, like "country girl" as a stigmatizing label targeting feminism. Such toxic neologisms appear benign but have evolved into toxic usage in public consensus, posing challenges to moderation systems and remaining underexplored. In this paper, we investigate how to detect implicit toxicity expressed via neologisms. We first propose a taxonomy that captures t
Record details
Published: 14 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Sympoietic creativity and the boundaries of qing : digital romance writers negotiating generative AI
AI & Society · 24 July 2026
“You Might Like Each Other”: Mass Customization and the Structuring of Sociality Among Chinese Generation Z on the Soul App
Social Media + Society · 19 July 2026
From Democracies to Autocracies: How AI Systems Enable Authoritarianism by Design
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of University Students' Willingness to Disclose AI Use: A Cognition-Affect-Conation Perspective
arXiv · 23 April 2026
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of Students' AI Use Concealment Intention in Higher Education: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA
arXiv · 13 April 2026
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
arXiv · 25 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 August 2026), “New Terms, New Toxicity: Consensus-based Chinese Neologism Toxicity Detection via Search-Augmented LLMs,” evidence record 19125, https://ethics.ai/record/19125 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.