Algorithmic Gender Prediction Is Illegitimate, But Gender Imputation Can Yield Valid Measurements
arXiv:2608.13444v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning ethics researchers and critical HCI scholars have argued that algorithmically predicting gender is wrong. At the same time, other researchers rely on predicted gender labels to study gender disparities and develop algorithmic fairness techniques. How do we reconcile these two seemingly contradictory intuitions? We differentiate two ways gender prediction may be wrong: being illegitimate, thereby contributing to harm; and being inva
Record details
Published: 14 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Algorithmic Gender Prediction Is Illegitimate, But Gender Imputation Can Yield Valid Measurements
arXiv · 13 August 2026
The Illusion of Improvement: Reject Inference Strategies in Credit Scoring
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
Applied and Filtered: An End-to-End Algorithmic Fairness Audit of A Public Employment Agency
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
From Fair Representation to Just Recognition in Generative AI
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
Reassessing demographic bias in face attribute classification: a statistically grounded multi-model evaluation on FairFace and UTKFace
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 14 August 2026
Language Models as a Challenge for Business Ethics – A Partially Open-Source Approach
Science and Engineering Ethics · 14 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 August 2026), “Algorithmic Gender Prediction Is Illegitimate, But Gender Imputation Can Yield Valid Measurements,” evidence record 19121, https://ethics.ai/record/19121 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.