Visibility Asymmetry: How Vendor Attention Shapes Which EdTech Breakdowns Become Product-Visible
arXiv:2608.12353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Infrastructure scholarship in CSCW often treats breakdown as the moment when infrastructures become visible. However, in vendor-managed sociotechnical systems, not all breakdowns become visible to actors who have the capacity to repair them. Drawing on a retrospective qualitative study of a Chinese K-12 EdTech deployment, including 11 interviews, 5 classroom observations, and more than 28 days of field notes, this paper introduces visibility asym
Record details
Published: 14 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Social Media as a Driver of Obesity in Children and Adolescents (Aged 6-18 Years): It Is Time for Regulatory Action
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
A Framework for Developing University Policies on Generative AI Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of Chinas vaccination policy
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
AI avatars are reshaping society in China — the law is trying to catch up
Nature Machine Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Teacher feedback and ChatGPT feedback on Chinese university EFL learners’ English essay revision: A mixed-methods study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on academic development of Chinese students in humanities and social sciences
arXiv · 23 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 August 2026), “Visibility Asymmetry: How Vendor Attention Shapes Which EdTech Breakdowns Become Product-Visible,” evidence record 19124, https://ethics.ai/record/19124 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.