Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a transformative force in higher education, offering both challenges and opportunities. This paper explores the multifaceted impact of GAI on academic work, with a focus on student life and, in particular, the implications for international students. While GAI, exemplified by models like ChatGPT, has the potential to revolutionize education, concerns about academic integrity have arisen, leading to debates on the use of AI detection tools.
Record details
Published: 4 November 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
OpenAlex · 30 October 2023
Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
OpenAlex · 30 November 2023
ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education
OpenAlex · 29 September 2023
Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students
OpenAlex · 15 December 2023
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney
OpenAlex · 4 September 2023
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 23 August 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 November 2023), “Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice,” evidence record 9412, https://ethics.ai/record/9412 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.