ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education
Although artificial intelligence (AI) has been part of our lives for some time, the launch of the Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) has given it renewed attention. While most of these debates are about higher education in general, this article focuses on schoolteacher education and teacher training. This research aimed to determine the contribution of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT in lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in education. The research used a qualitative app
Record details
Published: 29 September 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney
OpenAlex · 4 September 2023
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
OpenAlex · 30 October 2023
Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice
OpenAlex · 4 November 2023
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 23 August 2023
Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature
OpenAlex · 22 August 2023
New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution
OpenAlex · 16 August 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 September 2023), “ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education,” evidence record 9423, https://ethics.ai/record/9423 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.