Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
ChatGPT is revolutionizing the field of higher education by leveraging deep learning models to generate human-like content. However, its integration into academic settings raises concerns regarding academic integrity, plagiarism detection, and the potential impact on critical thinking skills. This article presents a study that adopts a thing ethnography approach to understand ChatGPT’s perspective on the challenges and opportunities it represents for higher education. The research explores the p
Record details
Published: 23 August 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Copyright & IP · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 13 March 2023
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 10 January 2023
Plagiarism or Productivity? Students Moral Disengagement and Behavioral Intentions to Use ChatGPT in Academic Writing
arXiv · 20 March 2026
Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature
OpenAlex · 22 August 2023
New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution
OpenAlex · 16 August 2023
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney
OpenAlex · 4 September 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 August 2023), “Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT,” evidence record 9297, https://ethics.ai/record/9297 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.