The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools have become increasingly accessible and have impacted school education in numerous ways. However, most of the discussions occur in higher education. In schools, teachers’ perspectives are crucial for making sense of innovative technologies. Accordingly, this qualitative study aims to investigate how GenAI changes our school education from the perspectives of teachers and leaders. It used four domains – learning, teaching, assessment, and administr
Record details
Published: 4 September 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution
OpenAlex · 16 August 2023
What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students
OpenAlex · 19 April 2023
A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 23 January 2024
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation:
OpenAlex · 7 March 2023
Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners
OpenAlex · 19 March 2024
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 September 2023), “The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney,” evidence record 9303, https://ethics.ai/record/9303 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.