Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
Open-source investigators and OSINV journalists have spent the last decade turning publicly available data into evidence of war crimes, environmental harms, and human rights abuses. More recently, they have trained the same lens on a different target: the algorithms, bot networks, and generative AI systems that industrialise deception and information disorder. The post Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder first appeared on HKS Misinformation Revie
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: HKS Misinformation Review
Category: Research
Topics: Misinformation · Environment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels
HKS Misinformation Review · 23 July 2026
Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions
HKS Misinformation Review · 29 July 2026
The future of fact-checking in the algorithmic society
HKS Misinformation Review · 28 July 2026
Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Transferable Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) Estimation Model from Multi-Sensor Data with Sparse Field Calibration
arXiv cs.LG · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder,” evidence record 18853, https://ethics.ai/record/18853 (originally published by HKS Misinformation Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.