Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
Major platforms constantly claim to fight disinformation and support the fact checking community, but their transparency reports and the empirical evidence from a survey of expert fact checkers across 21 EU countries show a different reality. This study finds that despite commitments made under EU regulations, expert fact checkers remain largely peripheral actors within the existing platform governance framework, with limited insight into how their work influences platform decisions. The post Ac
Record details
Published: 7 July 2026
Source: HKS Misinformation Review
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Misinformation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Problems with “General Purpose AI Detectability”
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 8 July 2026
New EU guidance on AI transparency: what should companies be doing from 2 August 2026
Baker McKenzie Connect On Tech · 2 July 2026
Europe’s AI labeling and transparency rules are now in effect
The Verge · 3 August 2026
Fact-checking at a crossroads: Fact checkers’ perspectives on Community Notes, AI integration, and design recommendations
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Financial Audit Assistance using Misinformation Detection and Explanation
arXiv · 20 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation,” evidence record 2139, https://ethics.ai/record/2139 (originally published by HKS Misinformation Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.