Evidence record 2139 · automatically gathered

Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation

Major platforms constantly claim to fight disinformation and support the fact checking community, but their transparency reports and the empirical evidence from a survey of expert fact checkers across 21 EU countries show a different reality. This study finds that despite commitments made under EU regulations, expert fact checkers remain largely peripheral actors within the existing platform governance framework, with limited insight into how their work influences platform decisions. The post Ac

Record details

Published: 7 July 2026
Source: HKS Misinformation Review
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Misinformation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation,” evidence record 2139, https://ethics.ai/record/2139 (originally published by HKS Misinformation Review).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.