Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels
Climate change amplifies natural disasters, posing an existential threat to our society. However, a digital storm is raging on right-wing extremist Telegram channels where climate disinformation works to delegitimize scientific consensus. Investigating the factors that amplify climate disinformation is as critical to combating it as understanding natural disasters and their drivers. We The post Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist
Record details
Published: 23 July 2026
Source: HKS Misinformation Review
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Misinformation · Environment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 23 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026
Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
The future of fact-checking in the algorithmic society
HKS Misinformation Review · 28 July 2026
Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions
HKS Misinformation Review · 29 July 2026
Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Sparse Tokens Suffice: Jailbreaking Audio Language Models via Token-Aware Gradient Optimization
arXiv · 6 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 July 2026), “Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels,” evidence record 12759, https://ethics.ai/record/12759 (originally published by HKS Misinformation Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.