AI ethics evidence index Search
Source-linked daily record
Evidence record 2135 · automatically gathered

Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence

Fact-checking has become a key response to disinformation during crises and conflicts, but its role is increasingly contested due to concerns about its effectiveness and its co-optation by different political actors. In polarized, high-choice environments, fact-checking is often embedded within partisan and state-aligned infrastructures, shaping validation and rejection of knowledge claims. The post Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence first app

Record details

Published: 7 July 2026
Source: HKS Misinformation Review
Category: Research
Topics: Misinformation · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Misinformation

Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels

HKS Misinformation Review · 23 July 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Misinformation

Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder

HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Misinformation

Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation

HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Misinformation

The future of fact-checking in the algorithmic society

HKS Misinformation Review · 28 July 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Misinformation

Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions

HKS Misinformation Review · 29 July 2026

Same publisher byline

Fact-checking at a crossroads: Fact checkers’ perspectives on Community Notes, AI integration, and design recommendations

HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence,” evidence record 2135, https://ethics.ai/record/2135 (originally published by HKS Misinformation Review).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.