Transferable Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) Estimation Model from Multi-Sensor Data with Sparse Field Calibration
Spatially continuous quantification of forest above-ground biomass (AGB) is what makes carbon accounting credible and mitigation strategies actionable. While field inventories provide high localized accuracy, they are spatially sparse; conversely, spaceborne LiDAR from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) offers broad biomass samples but lacks spatial continuity and systematic underestimation of high-biomass forests. This paper presents an operational framework centered on a single
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Environment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026
NavSight in the Wild: Understanding Real-World Use of a Mobile Augmented Reality Application for People with Low Vision in Outdoor Navigation
arXiv cs.HC · 13 August 2026
MarsCast: Transfer Learning of AI Weather Foundation Models to Planetary Atmospheres
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
Exploring Cross-Reality Transitions between Projections and Head-Mounted Displays for Immersive Digital Art
arXiv cs.HC · 5 August 2026
Evaluating the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in Gaze-Based 3D Target Selection
arXiv cs.HC · 29 July 2026
Revitalizing Public Urban Places through Cultural and Political Memory: A Technological Approach with LLMs and Augmented Reality
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Transferable Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) Estimation Model from Multi-Sensor Data with Sparse Field Calibration,” evidence record 19069, https://ethics.ai/record/19069 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.