Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions
When 54 international experts assessed AI-generated disinformation threats, they revealed a surprising pattern: while video deepfakes received the highest average threat ratings in the political domain (M = 6.31/7), the pattern differed in the health domain, where AI-generated text received the highest average rating (M = 5.80). The post Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions first appeared on HKS Misinformation Review .
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: HKS Misinformation Review
Category: Research
Topics: Misinformation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 30 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The future of fact-checking in the algorithmic society
HKS Misinformation Review · 28 July 2026
Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels
HKS Misinformation Review · 23 July 2026
Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026
Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Defining Health Misinformation: Theoretical Concept Analysis
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions,” evidence record 14638, https://ethics.ai/record/14638 (originally published by HKS Misinformation Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.