Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses
Abstract As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT become more capable and accessible, their use in educational settings is likely to grow. However, the academic community lacks a comprehensive understanding of the perceptions and attitudes of students and instructors toward these new tools. In the Fall 2023 semester, we surveyed 982 students and 76 faculty at a large public university in the United States, focusing on topics such as perceived ease of use, ethical conce
Record details
Published: 23 January 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Regulating Artificial Intimacy: From Locks and Blocks to Relational Accountability
arXiv · 20 April 2026
Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines
OpenAlex · 18 January 2025
Application of ChatGPT-assisted problem-based learning teaching method in clinical medical education
OpenAlex · 11 January 2025
Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
OpenAlex · 5 February 2025
AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination
OpenAlex · 8 February 2025
The impact of generative <scp>AI</scp> on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context
OpenAlex · 31 March 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 January 2025), “Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses,” evidence record 9841, https://ethics.ai/record/9841 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.