The impact of generative <scp>AI</scp> on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context
Generative AI (hereinafter GenAI) technology, such as ChatGPT, is already influencing the higher education sector. In this work, we focused on the impact of GenAI on the academic integrity of assessments within higher education institutions, as GenAI can be used to circumvent assessment approaches within the sector, compromising their quality. The purpose of our research was threefold: first, to determine the extent to which the use of GenAI can be detected via the marking and moderation process
Record details
Published: 31 March 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis
OpenAlex · 6 May 2025
Impact of large language model (ChatGPT) in healthcare: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis
OpenAlex · 7 May 2025
AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination
OpenAlex · 8 February 2025
Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
OpenAlex · 5 February 2025
Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses
OpenAlex · 23 January 2025
Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field
OpenAlex · 10 June 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (31 March 2025), “The impact of generative <scp>AI</scp> on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context,” evidence record 9813, https://ethics.ai/record/9813 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.