RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis
As a new type of artificial intelligence, ChatGPT is becoming widely used in learning. However, academic consensus regarding its efficacy remains elusive. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in improving students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking through a meta-analysis of 51 research studies published between November 2022 and February 2025. The results indicate that ChatGPT has a large positive impact on improving learning performance ( g
Record details
Published: 6 May 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Impact of large language model (ChatGPT) in healthcare: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis
OpenAlex · 7 May 2025
Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field
OpenAlex · 10 June 2025
The impact of generative <scp>AI</scp> on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context
OpenAlex · 31 March 2025
AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination
OpenAlex · 8 February 2025
Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
OpenAlex · 5 February 2025
Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses
OpenAlex · 23 January 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 May 2025), “RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis,” evidence record 9672, https://ethics.ai/record/9672 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.