Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field
Abstract The release of ChatGPT in late 2022 marked the beginning of a rapid transformation in higher education, soon followed by the development of multimodal generative AI programs. As this technology becomes increasingly integrated into teaching and learning, it is crucial to evaluate its current use and impact. This systematic literature review captures the initial academic response to generative AI, providing insights into how higher education has adopted this transformative technology in i
Record details
Published: 10 June 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Impact of large language model (ChatGPT) in healthcare: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis
OpenAlex · 7 May 2025
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis
OpenAlex · 6 May 2025
The impact of generative <scp>AI</scp> on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context
OpenAlex · 31 March 2025
AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination
OpenAlex · 8 February 2025
Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
OpenAlex · 5 February 2025
Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses
OpenAlex · 23 January 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 June 2025), “Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field,” evidence record 9756, https://ethics.ai/record/9756 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.