Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature
This study examines the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant in academia through a systematic literature review of the 30 most relevant articles. Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has become the most debated topic among scholars and is also being used by many users from different fields. Many articles, reviews, blogs, and opinion essays have been published in which the potential role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant is discussed. For this systematic review, 550 articles published si
Record details
Published: 22 August 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 23 August 2023
New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution
OpenAlex · 16 August 2023
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney
OpenAlex · 4 September 2023
Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
OpenAlex · 16 July 2023
ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education
OpenAlex · 29 September 2023
Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings
OpenAlex · 7 July 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 August 2023), “Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature,” evidence record 9390, https://ethics.ai/record/9390 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.