A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
ChatGPT is an AI tool that has sparked debates about its potential implications for education. We used the SWOT analysis framework to outline ChatGPT’s strengths and weaknesses and to discuss its opportunities for and threats to education. The strengths include using a sophisticated natural language model to generate plausible answers, self-improving capability, and providing personalised and real-time responses. As such, ChatGPT can increase access to information, facilitate personalised and co
Record details
Published: 27 March 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 3 April 2023
ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning
OpenAlex · 20 March 2023
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education
OpenAlex · 14 March 2023
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 13 March 2023
Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI)
OpenAlex · 9 March 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 March 2023), “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research,” evidence record 9278, https://ethics.ai/record/9278 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.