The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical education has the potential to revolutionize the way students learn about biomedical sciences. Large language models, such as ChatGPT, can serve as virtual teaching assistants, providing students with detailed and relevant information and perhaps eventually interactive simulations. ChatGPT has the potential to increase student engagement and enhance student learning, though research is needed to confirm this. The challenges and limitat
Record details
Published: 14 March 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers
OpenAlex · 2 March 2023
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
OpenAlex · 19 February 2023
Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings
OpenAlex · 7 July 2023
The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review
OpenAlex · 23 April 2024
Application of ChatGPT-assisted problem-based learning teaching method in clinical medical education
OpenAlex · 11 January 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 March 2023), “The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education,” evidence record 9329, https://ethics.ai/record/9329 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.