ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning
The release of ChatGPT has sparked significant academic integrity concerns in higher education. However, some commentators have pointed out that generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT can enhance student learning. Consequently, academics should adapt their teaching and assessment practices to embrace the new reality of living, working, and studying in a world where AI is freely available. Despite this important debate, very little academic literature has been published on
Record details
Published: 20 March 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education
OpenAlex · 14 March 2023
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
OpenAlex · 27 March 2023
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 13 March 2023
Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI)
OpenAlex · 9 March 2023
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
OpenAlex · 9 March 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 March 2023), “ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning,” evidence record 9298, https://ethics.ai/record/9298 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.