Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review
Abstract Study success includes the successful completion of a first degree in higher education to the largest extent, and the successful completion of individual learning tasks to the smallest extent. Factors affecting study success range from individual dispositions (e.g., motivation, prior academic performance) to characteristics of the educational environment (e.g., attendance, active learning, social embeddedness). Recent developments in learning analytics, which are a socio-technical data
Record details
Published: 12 June 2020
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A future for the world's children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission
OpenAlex · 1 February 2020
Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment
OpenAlex · 20 May 2019
AN EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION OF THE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FRAMEWORK
OpenAlex · 11 February 2019
Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education
OpenAlex · 28 January 2022
Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity
OpenAlex · 15 August 2018
Examining the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Social and Computer Anxiety in E-Learning Settings: Students’ Perceptions at the University Level
OpenAlex · 9 November 2022
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 June 2020), “Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review,” evidence record 8764, https://ethics.ai/record/8764 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.