Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education
Abstract Preparing students to collaborate with AI remains a challenging goal. As AI technologies are new to K-12 schools, there is a lack of studies that inform how to design learning when AI is introduced as a collaborative learning agent to classrooms. The present study, therefore, aimed to explore teachers’ perspectives on what (1) curriculum design, (2) student-AI interaction, and (3) learning environments are required to design student-AI collaboration (SAC) in learning and (4) how SAC wou
Record details
Published: 28 January 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning Pathways
OpenAlex · 9 December 2022
Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity
OpenAlex · 15 August 2018
Eco-Bee: A Personalised Multi-Modal Agent for Advancing Student Climate Awareness and Sustainable Behaviour in Campus Ecosystems
arXiv · 6 March 2026
Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 15 July 2026
From Scoring to Acting: Outcome-Verified Comparative Self-Distillation for LLM Agents
arXiv · 30 July 2026
ResidencyRL: Reinforcement Learning in Simulated Clinical Environments
arXiv · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 January 2022), “Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education,” evidence record 9091, https://ethics.ai/record/9091 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.