Student views in AI Ethics and Social Impact
An investigation, from a gender perspective, of how students view the ethical implications and societal effects of artificial intelligence is conducted, examining concepts that could have a big influence on how artificial intelligence may be taught in the future. For this, we conducted a survey on a cohort of 230 second year computer science students to reveal their opinions. The results revealed that AI, from the students' perspective, will significantly impact daily life, particularly in areas
Record details
Published: 19 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Thinking in Different Spaces: Domain-Specific Latent Geometry Survives Cross-Architecture Translation
arXiv · 20 March 2026
LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education
arXiv · 17 March 2026
Exploring Data Augmentation and Resampling Strategies for Transformer-Based Models to Address Class Imbalance in AI Scoring of Scientific Explanations in NGSS Classroom
arXiv · 21 March 2026
Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: how dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning
OpenAlex · 24 March 2026
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
arXiv · 25 March 2026
Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education
arXiv · 27 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (19 March 2026), “Student views in AI Ethics and Social Impact,” evidence record 7011, https://ethics.ai/record/7011 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.