LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education
Background: Cheating in university education is commonly described as context dependent and influenced by assessment design, institutional norms, and student interpretation. In software engineering education, programming oriented coursework has historically involved ambiguity around collaboration, reuse, and external assistance. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have introduced additional mediation in the production of code and related artifacts. Aims: This study investigates how software e
Record details
Published: 17 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Student views in AI Ethics and Social Impact
arXiv · 19 March 2026
Thinking in Different Spaces: Domain-Specific Latent Geometry Survives Cross-Architecture Translation
arXiv · 20 March 2026
Exploring Data Augmentation and Resampling Strategies for Transformer-Based Models to Address Class Imbalance in AI Scoring of Scientific Explanations in NGSS Classroom
arXiv · 21 March 2026
Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: how dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning
OpenAlex · 24 March 2026
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
arXiv · 25 March 2026
A Consensus-Driven Multi-LLM Pipeline for Missing-Person Investigations
arXiv · 9 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 March 2026), “LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education,” evidence record 7096, https://ethics.ai/record/7096 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.