Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, yet barriers to its adoption across different disciplines and institutional roles remain underexplored. Existing literature frequently attributes adoption barriers to individual-level factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. This study instead investigates whether such barriers are structurally produced. Drawing on a multi-method survey analysis of 272 academic and professional services (PSs) staff at
Record details
Published: 27 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Instructor-Created Custom GPTs as Pedagogical Partners Fostering Immersion in Online Higher Education: Two Case Studies
arXiv · 29 March 2026
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
arXiv · 25 March 2026
Evaluating LLMs for Answering Student Questions in Introductory Programming Courses
arXiv · 30 March 2026
How unique are hallucinated citations offered by generative Artificial Intelligence models?
arXiv · 31 March 2026
Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: how dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning
OpenAlex · 24 March 2026
Exploring Data Augmentation and Resampling Strategies for Transformer-Based Models to Address Class Imbalance in AI Scoring of Scientific Explanations in NGSS Classroom
arXiv · 21 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 March 2026), “Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education,” evidence record 6651, https://ethics.ai/record/6651 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.