Teacher-regulated generative AI support, student agency, and perceived learning gains in higher education: the moderating role of perceived fairness
IntroductionGenerative artificial intelligence is increasingly used in higher education, yet its educational value depends not only on technological access but also on how its use is pedagogically regulated. This study examined how teacher-regulated generative AI support is associated with university students' perceived learning gains in higher education. It further tested whether student agency mediates this association and whether perceived fairness conditions the strength of the association b
Record details
Published: 13 July 2026
Source: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv · 13 July 2026
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Deterministic Decisions for High-Stakes AI. A Zero-Egress Pipeline with the Deployability of RAG and the Accuracy of Machine Learning
arXiv · 28 June 2026
Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning
arXiv · 23 April 2026
GIGO and the Human Processor: A Chief Humanity Officer Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
GIGO and the Human Processor: A CHO Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 July 2026), “Teacher-regulated generative AI support, student agency, and perceived learning gains in higher education: the moderating role of perceived fairness,” evidence record 2200, https://ethics.ai/record/2200 (originally published by Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.