Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
The promise of AI literacy ``for all'' confronts a structural challenge embedded in how nations organise secondary computer science education. In most systems, a general-track subject -- Digital Literacy, ICT, TIC, or SNT -- bears the weight of universal AI literacy, while a specialist Informatics course serves STEM pathways separately. Yet the content and depth of the general track are shaped by governance decisions made largely with reference to the specialist one. This paper presents a compar
Record details
Published: 13 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Teacher-regulated generative AI support, student agency, and perceived learning gains in higher education: the moderating role of perceived fairness
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 13 July 2026
Deterministic Decisions for High-Stakes AI. A Zero-Egress Pipeline with the Deployability of RAG and the Accuracy of Machine Learning
arXiv · 28 June 2026
Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning
arXiv · 23 April 2026
GIGO and the Human Processor: A Chief Humanity Officer Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
GIGO and the Human Processor: A CHO Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 July 2026), “Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis,” evidence record 13, https://ethics.ai/record/13 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.