Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning
The rapid uptake of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education is reshaping assessment practices and intensifying concerns around academic integrity, fairness, and learning quality. While institutional responses increasingly emphasise policy guidance and ethical principles, there remains limited formal understanding of how collective norms of responsible or opportunistic AI use emerge and stabilise within student cohorts. This paper reframes student AI use in assessment as a coo
Record details
Published: 23 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
GIGO and the Human Processor: A Chief Humanity Officer Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
GIGO and the Human Processor: A CHO Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
Deterministic Decisions for High-Stakes AI. A Zero-Egress Pipeline with the Deployability of RAG and the Accuracy of Machine Learning
arXiv · 28 June 2026
Teacher-regulated generative AI support, student agency, and perceived learning gains in higher education: the moderating role of perceived fairness
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 13 July 2026
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv · 13 July 2026
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 April 2026), “Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning,” evidence record 5429, https://ethics.ai/record/5429 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.