The impact of item-writing flaws on difficulty and discrimination in item response theory
Publication date: December 2026 Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 11 Author(s): Robin Schmucker, Steven Moore
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Bias and representation in AI generated text-to-image in education: A systematic review
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Beyond binary outcomes: Evaluating and mitigating bias in national standardized test score prediction
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Beyond “painting in pink”: A critical case study of all-girls generative AI workshops in a European makerspace and implications for gender equity in computing
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Enhancing fairness and transparency in student project evaluation: A spherical fuzzy alternative prioritization and assessment system-based decision support
Technology in Society · 14 July 2026
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)
arXiv cs.HC · 15 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “The impact of item-writing flaws on difficulty and discrimination in item response theory,” evidence record 2169, https://ethics.ai/record/2169 (originally published by Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.