When conversational AI personalises too much: Refining privacy calculus for bundled interactional cues in AI-mediated disclosure
Publication date: November 2026 Source: Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 184 Author(s): Khanh Duy Phan, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Computers in Human Behavior
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Federated and explainable learning analytics for privacy-preserving academic risk modeling across heterogeneous educational institutions
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
ViHoRec: A Quality-Controlled Vietnamese Hotel Recommendation Dataset and Cold-Start Benchmark
arXiv cs.AI · 14 July 2026
Plausible Deniability Guarantees for Whistleblowers
arXiv cs.LG · 15 July 2026
Post-Deployment Accountability in AI Governance: A Cross-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of AI Incidents
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
Trustworthy Machine Learning through the Lens of Combinatorial Optimization: Survey and Research Perspectives
arXiv fairness query · 8 July 2026
CITRUS: Candidate Inference and Temporal-tracking for Reliable, Unobtrusive Sensing of Wearable Heart Rate under Motion
arXiv cs.HC · 21 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “When conversational AI personalises too much: Refining privacy calculus for bundled interactional cues in AI-mediated disclosure,” evidence record 2099, https://ethics.ai/record/2099 (originally published by Computers in Human Behavior).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.