Evidence record 10550 · automatically gathered

Post-Deployment Accountability in AI Governance: A Cross-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of AI Incidents

arXiv:2605.16281v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-deployment accountability has become central to AI governance, yet little empirical evidence shows whether monitoring, incident reporting, and impact assessment obligations are visible when AI systems fail. This study analyzes real-world AI incidents from the AI Incident Database (2020--2026) and codes them against nine post-deployment provisions from the EU AI Act, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and the GDPR. The findings show sub

Record details

Published: 16 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy · Transparency
Retrieved: 16 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Post-Deployment Accountability in AI Governance: A Cross-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of AI Incidents,” evidence record 10550, https://ethics.ai/record/10550 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.