Trustworthy Machine Learning through the Lens of Combinatorial Optimization: Survey and Research Perspectives
Modern machine learning (ML) increasingly relies on complex models whose behavior is difficult to characterize beyond empirical performance metrics. Across a wide range of tasks, including prediction, generation, and decision-making, models with similar empirical performance can exhibit markedly different properties in terms of their transparency, interpretability, robustness, fairness, privacy, and certifiability. This survey highlights how optimization- and certification-oriented reasoning can
Record details
Published: 8 July 2026
Source: arXiv fairness query
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Privacy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
X-FEMR: A Token-level Explainable Approach for Electronic Health Records Foundation Models using Transformer-based Models
arXiv · 7 July 2026
TIER: Trajectory-Invariant Explanation Regularization for Membership Privacy
arXiv · 3 July 2026
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv · 30 July 2026
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv cs.CY · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 July 2026), “Trustworthy Machine Learning through the Lens of Combinatorial Optimization: Survey and Research Perspectives,” evidence record 3059, https://ethics.ai/record/3059 (originally published by arXiv fairness query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.