Evidence record 12607 · automatically gathered

CITRUS: Candidate Inference and Temporal-tracking for Reliable, Unobtrusive Sensing of Wearable Heart Rate under Motion

Wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) provides continuous heart-rate measurements, but its accuracy degrades under motion. In the ring-platform benchmark, the best supervised baseline reaches 5.33 BPM mean absolute error (MAE) on the overall heart-rate task. In the motion-focused ring-only audit, a supervised LSTM baseline reaches $14.39 \pm 0.47$ BPM MAE on motion windows, and simple smoothing and ACC priors reduce this only to $13.00 \pm 0.41$ BPM. This thesis addresses motion-corrupted HR estim

Record details

Published: 21 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Transparency
Retrieved: 22 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (21 July 2026), “CITRUS: Candidate Inference and Temporal-tracking for Reliable, Unobtrusive Sensing of Wearable Heart Rate under Motion,” evidence record 12607, https://ethics.ai/record/12607 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.