Early and late adoption and appropriation of LLMs differs by gender, age, and technology education
Publication date: Available online 14 August 2026 Source: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Author(s): Fiona Draxler, Daniel Buschek, Mikke Tavast, Juhi Kulshrestha, Robin Welsch
Record details
Published: 15 August 2026
Source: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 15 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The IDEA Framework for Metacognitively Regulated GenAI Use in Higher Education: Development and Exploratory Pilot Evidence
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 15 August 2026
Rewriting the Curriculum: A Systematic Review of Generative AI-Driven Pedagogical Change and Emerging Systems of Learning in Higher Education
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 15 August 2026
LLMs do not grade essays like humans
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 15 August 2026
Future Design as Temporal-Ethical Pedagogy: Towards “Open Futures” in Education
Futures (Elsevier) · 14 August 2026
Visibility Asymmetry: How Vendor Attention Shapes Which EdTech Breakdowns Become Product-Visible
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
Impact of introducing "Informatics I" to the common university entrance examination in Japan: a longitudinal study on students' perceptions of their information-related knowledge and skills from 2006 to 2026
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 August 2026), “Early and late adoption and appropriation of LLMs differs by gender, age, and technology education,” evidence record 20162, https://ethics.ai/record/20162 (originally published by International Journal of Human-Computer Studies).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.