AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) can produce educational content at scale, including interactive and narrative learning experiences, but technical generation alone is not sufficient: scenarios that are confusing, narratively inconsistent, or unengaging are unlikely to be useful in practice. This paper presents a pilot user-centred evaluation of AI-generated interactive fiction (IF) for educational use in higher education. Using a previously described domain-agnostic pipeline and a shared
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Trump wants MMR vaccine split up: the science behind why it’s a bad idea
Nature Machine Intelligence · 11 August 2026
INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
arXiv · 11 August 2026
How Children Collaborate within Programmable AR Environments with Co-Located Collaborative Features
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
ResonaVis: Visualizing Interactive Music Data to Support Reflective Music Composition for Therapeutic Contexts
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement,” evidence record 18666, https://ethics.ai/record/18666 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.