Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities
This study examines the impact of technology within media education, media literacy, and educommunication, and explores how these fields are perceived and understood by students and academic experts, focusing on the development of critical competencies and critical media literacy. Based on semi-structured in-depth interviews with leading experts in the field of critical media literacy, and a survey conducted with 141 university students in Communication and Education programs, this study explore
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Trump wants MMR vaccine split up: the science behind why it’s a bad idea
Nature Machine Intelligence · 11 August 2026
ResonaVis: Visualizing Interactive Music Data to Support Reflective Music Composition for Therapeutic Contexts
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
How Children Collaborate within Programmable AR Environments with Co-Located Collaborative Features
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Codebook-Guided Coding of Students' Mathematics Metaphor Responses
arXiv cs.HC · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities,” evidence record 18412, https://ethics.ai/record/18412 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.