INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
Large Language Model (LLM)-based simulators often reproduce observable actions but fail to capture the underlying reasoning behind them. In education, where student simulation is increasingly used for various applications such as evaluating tutoring systems, this gap is especially pronounced. Two students may submit identical submissions for entirely different reasons. We present INTERNAL STUDENT DIALOGUE (INSIDE), a student modeling framework that fine-tunes LLMs not only to act like students b
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
ResonaVis: Visualizing Interactive Music Data to Support Reflective Music Composition for Therapeutic Contexts
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities
arXiv · 11 August 2026
AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Codebook-Guided Coding of Students' Mathematics Metaphor Responses
arXiv cs.HC · 10 August 2026
Social Media as a Driver of Obesity in Children and Adolescents (Aged 6-18 Years): It Is Time for Regulatory Action
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators,” evidence record 18425, https://ethics.ai/record/18425 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.