AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
arXiv:2608.10818v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) can produce educational content at scale, including interactive and narrative learning experiences, but technical generation alone is not sufficient: scenarios that are confusing, narratively inconsistent, or unengaging are unlikely to be useful in practice. This paper presents a pilot user-centred evaluation of AI-generated interactive fiction (IF) for educational use in higher education. Using a previousl
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
arXiv cs.HC · 11 August 2026
ELBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Education-Facing Large Language Models
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Rural School Bus Routing and Scheduling
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Two-Phase Simulated Annealing for Equitable Team Formation: Eliminating Complaints in Large Engineering Cohorts
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Access Timing as Scaffolding: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to GenAI in Education
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement,” evidence record 18367, https://ethics.ai/record/18367 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.