Revisiting the Communication Mediation Model in the Age of Social Media: Longitudinal Evidence From Climate Misinformation Responses in China
Social Media + Society, Volume 12, Issue 3, July-September 2026. The Communication Mediation Model (CMM) posits that media attention stimulates interpersonal discussion, which shapes attitudes and behaviors. Yet its assumptions of linear sequencing and universal applicability remain underexamined. In the era of social ...
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: Social Media + Society
Category: Research
Topics: Misinformation · Environment
Retrieved: 6 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Teffic-Audio: Tell Fact from Fiction
arXiv cs.AI · 30 July 2026
Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026
Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels
HKS Misinformation Review · 23 July 2026
Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Friend or Foe? Language as an ideological switch in open-weight LLMs under Russian disinformation stress
arXiv · 7 June 2026
Long Live Fine-Tuning: Task-Specific Transformers Outperform Zero-Shot LLMs for Misinformation Response Classification on Reddit
arXiv · 2 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Revisiting the Communication Mediation Model in the Age of Social Media: Longitudinal Evidence From Climate Misinformation Responses in China,” evidence record 16714, https://ethics.ai/record/16714 (originally published by Social Media + Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.