Friend or Foe? Language as an ideological switch in open-weight LLMs under Russian disinformation stress
As Russia's war against Ukraine extends into generative AI, large language models (LLMs) adapted for local post-Soviet languages are deployed in contested information environments. Policy and industry discourse assumes that culturally aligned adaptation encodes the political orientation of the target community: a Ukrainian-oriented model will resist Russian narratives, a Russian-oriented one will reinforce them. Does it? This article systematically disconfirms that assumption. We run a controlle
Record details
Published: 7 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Misinformation · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
After Colombia’s Presidential Election, What Next on Climate and Human Rights?
Just Security · 15 July 2026
Emergence World: A Platform for Evaluating Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Autonomy
arXiv · 6 June 2026
Sustainability and Artificial Intelligence: Necessary, Challenging, and Promising Intersections
arXiv · 8 June 2026
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
HERO: Hindsight-Enhanced Reflection from Environment Observations for Agentic Self-Distillation
arXiv · 10 June 2026
Misaligned AI as a New Insider Risk
arXiv · 4 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 June 2026), “Friend or Foe? Language as an ideological switch in open-weight LLMs under Russian disinformation stress,” evidence record 1301, https://ethics.ai/record/1301 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.