One Vote, Several Parliaments: An Empirical Analysis of the Algorithmic Ambiguity of the Italian Electoral Law on the 2022 General Election Data
arXiv:2607.11676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crafa's algorithmic analysis of the Italian electoral law (D.P.R. 361/1957, as amended by Law 165/2017, the Rosatellum) showed that the statutory text distributing proportional seats among territories (Art. 83(1)(h)) admits at least three algorithmic interpretations, which can elect different people from the same votes. We test this empirically: we implement the full seat-allocation pipeline (Arts. 77, 83, 83-bis, 84, 85) and run the three interpre
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Misinformation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Beyond AI-Generated Labels: Watermarking, Co-Creation, and Conflation of AI-Generation with Disinformation
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
Revising research practices for singing data collection
AI & Society · 12 July 2026
Financial Audit Assistance using Misinformation Detection and Explanation
arXiv · 20 July 2026
Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
Once a Response, Always a Response: Detecting LLM-generated Text via Latent Prompt Restoration
arXiv · 6 August 2026
Friend or Foe? Language as an ideological switch in open-weight LLMs under Russian disinformation stress
arXiv · 7 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “One Vote, Several Parliaments: An Empirical Analysis of the Algorithmic Ambiguity of the Italian Electoral Law on the 2022 General Election Data,” evidence record 1543, https://ethics.ai/record/1543 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.