{
  "id": 1543,
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11676",
  "title": "One Vote, Several Parliaments: An Empirical Analysis of the Algorithmic Ambiguity of the Italian Electoral Law on the 2022 General Election Data",
  "summary": "arXiv:2607.11676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crafa's algorithmic analysis of the Italian electoral law (D.P.R. 361/1957, as amended by Law 165/2017, the Rosatellum) showed that the statutory text distributing proportional seats among territories (Art. 83(1)(h)) admits at least three algorithmic interpretations, which can elect different people from the same votes. We test this empirically: we implement the full seat-allocation pipeline (Arts. 77, 83, 83-bis, 84, 85) and run the three interpre",
  "authors": "Paolo Coppola",
  "category": "research",
  "topics": "regulation,misinformation",
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-07-14T04:00:00.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-07-14T16:04:12.223Z",
  "source_slug": "arxiv-cscy",
  "source_name": "arXiv cs.CY",
  "source_homepage": "https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CY/recent",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/1543",
  "original_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11676",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}