Revising research practices for singing data collection
As AI voice synthesis enables increasingly sophisticated vocal deepfakes and non-consensual voice cloning, the governance, licensing and access of singing datasets has become an urgent concern for data-contributors, who face significant harms from downstream and non-consensual usage of their singing data. Singing datasets are foundational to the development of high fidelity voice AI synthesis, yet current data collection practices pose challenges: data-contributors have an event-centric contribu
Record details
Published: 12 July 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Misinformation · Copyright & IP
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
One Vote, Several Parliaments: An Empirical Analysis of the Algorithmic Ambiguity of the Italian Electoral Law on the 2022 General Election Data
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
A holistic framework for analyzing spectrum licensing models— illustrated by local licensing for 5G and 6G networks
Telecommunications Policy · 14 July 2026
The exhaustion principle in copyright and modern digital markets
Telecommunications Policy · 14 July 2026
Beyond AI-Generated Labels: Watermarking, Co-Creation, and Conflation of AI-Generation with Disinformation
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
TILDE: TILt-based Distributional Erasure for Concept Unlearning
arXiv · 7 July 2026
Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 July 2026), “Revising research practices for singing data collection,” evidence record 1996, https://ethics.ai/record/1996 (originally published by AI & Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.