Patterns of Learner-AI Interaction and Academic Performance in an Object-Oriented Programming Course
arXiv:2607.24755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This full research paper examines how different forms of learner-AI interaction relate to learning outcomes in object-oriented programming (OOP) courses. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are increasingly used by students in programming education, yet evidence on their educational impact remains mixed. In particular, little is known about how students integrate GenAI tools when learning OOP, and how different patterns of use relate
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Generative AI Availability, Grades, and Student Satisfaction at a Large University
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Less Deliberate in Teams: Student LLM Use Across Individual and Collaborative Work
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Effort Matters in Score-Based Admissions: How Retaking and Aggregation Shape Test Scores
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Detecting CSAM Text-to-Image LoRAs From Weights
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Empathy and the Human-Moment Gaps of AI Chatbots: Insights from Empathy Displacement Theory
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
From Idea to Classroom in Days: Using "Vibe Coding" to Create a Programming Process Visualizer from IDE Activity Logs
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Patterns of Learner-AI Interaction and Academic Performance in an Object-Oriented Programming Course,” evidence record 14098, https://ethics.ai/record/14098 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.