Less Deliberate in Teams: Student LLM Use Across Individual and Collaborative Work
arXiv:2606.30860v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become common in computing courses, we need to understand how the social setting shapes how students use them. This paper reports findings from a semester-long study of 96 undergraduate students who completed six assignments, alternating between individual homework and team project milestones. We tracked LLM usage, prompting habits, and how students verified AI-generated output across all six assignments. LLM usa
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Generative AI Availability, Grades, and Student Satisfaction at a Large University
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Effort Matters in Score-Based Admissions: How Retaking and Aggregation Shape Test Scores
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Detecting CSAM Text-to-Image LoRAs From Weights
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Empathy and the Human-Moment Gaps of AI Chatbots: Insights from Empathy Displacement Theory
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
From Idea to Classroom in Days: Using "Vibe Coding" to Create a Programming Process Visualizer from IDE Activity Logs
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Patterns of Learner-AI Interaction and Academic Performance in an Object-Oriented Programming Course
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Less Deliberate in Teams: Student LLM Use Across Individual and Collaborative Work,” evidence record 14111, https://ethics.ai/record/14111 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.