Evidence record 9769 · automatically gathered

Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI

Abstract As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, law, and public administration, automation bias (AB)—the tendency to over-rely on automated recommendations—has emerged as a critical challenge in human–AI collaboration. While previous reviews have examined AB in traditional computer-assisted decision-making, research on its implications in modern AI-driven work environments remains limited. To address this gap, this research system

Record details

Published: 3 July 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Jobs & economy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (3 July 2025), “Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI,” evidence record 9769, https://ethics.ai/record/9769 (originally published by OpenAlex).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.