Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI
Abstract As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, law, and public administration, automation bias (AB)—the tendency to over-rely on automated recommendations—has emerged as a critical challenge in human–AI collaboration. While previous reviews have examined AB in traditional computer-assisted decision-making, research on its implications in modern AI-driven work environments remains limited. To address this gap, this research system
Record details
Published: 3 July 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Jobs & economy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias
arXiv · 13 June 2026
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI
OpenAlex · 27 February 2025
AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development
OpenAlex · 7 February 2025
Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 16 January 2026
Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 6 February 2026
Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes
arXiv · 10 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 July 2025), “Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI,” evidence record 9769, https://ethics.ai/record/9769 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.