Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes
In ubiquitous and mobile health systems, computational models infer human states from wearable, behavioral, and physiological sensing data. In these settings, high accuracy alone is insufficient; models must act ethically and equitably across diverse people, contexts, and devices. However, fairness methods that rely on demographic or heterogeneous attributes during training are difficult to enforce because such attributes are often unavailable, privacy-sensitive, regulated, or undesirable to col
Record details
Published: 10 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Privacy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 6 February 2026
Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
arXiv · 16 July 2026
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI
OpenAlex · 27 February 2025
AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development
OpenAlex · 7 February 2025
Semantic Risk Scoring of Aggregated Metrics: An AI-Driven Approach for Healthcare Data Governance
arXiv · 9 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 March 2026), “Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes,” evidence record 7439, https://ethics.ai/record/7439 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.