Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias
The purpose of this qualitative multi-case study was to examine how social bias emerges, is perceived, and can be mitigated within artificial intelligence and machine learning systems by practitioners directly involved in their design, development, and governance. Although examples from healthcare, criminal justice, employment, and education were used to illustrate domains where automated systems shape everyday life, the study focused on the lived experiences and professional insights of AI prac
Record details
Published: 13 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Jobs & economy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI
OpenAlex · 3 July 2025
Bridging Geographic Bias in Urban Streetscape Inference via Lifelong Learning with Visual-Semantic Pivoting
arXiv · 13 June 2026
AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Bridging Expert Knowledge and Automated Feature Engineering via Self-Evolution
arXiv · 7 June 2026
Testing the Black Box: Structural Barriers to Independent Evaluation of Consumer-Facing Health LLMs
arXiv · 7 June 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 June 2026), “Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias,” evidence record 1037, https://ethics.ai/record/1037 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.